Baros Method Critical Analysis(bariatric Analysis and Reporting System).
نویسندگان
چکیده
INTRODUCTION Although it has received several criticisms, which is considered to be the most effective method used for global assessment of morbid obesity surgical treatment, still needs to be updated. OBJECTIVE Critical analysis of BAROS constitution and method. METHOD BAROS as headings was searched in literature review using data from the main bariatric surgery journals until 2009. RESULTS Where found and assessed 121 papers containing criticisms on BAROS constitution and methodology. It has some failures and few researches show results on the use of this instrument, although it is still considered a standard method. Several authors that used it found imperfections in its methodology and suggested some changes addressed to improving its acceptance, showing the need of developing new methods to qualify the bariatric surgery results. CONCLUSION BAROS constitution has failures and its methodology needs to be updated.
منابع مشابه
Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS) applied to laparoscopic gastric banding patients.
BACKGROUND The definition of success and failure of a bariatric procedure should include weight loss as well as improvement in comorbidity and quality of life assessment. The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS), introduced by Oria and Moorhead in 1997, seems to provide a standard for comparison in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity. METHODS 180 morbidly obese and sup...
متن کاملBariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS): Toward the Uniform Assessment of Bariatric Surgery Outcomes
p i n c i q Continuous evaluation of our medical or surgical practice is essential to ensure we are providing high quality care to our patients. Nonetheless, to measure the outcomes of our practice we need to use a standardized and valid method that allows us to monitor our practice and to compare our practice with the practice of others. The evaluation of results in bariatric surgery is compli...
متن کاملBariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS)
BACKGROUND The lack of standards for comparison of results was identified by the NIH Consensus Conference panelists as one of the key problems in evaluating reports in the surgical treatment of severe obesity. The analysis of outcomes after bariatric surgery should include weight loss, improvement in comorbidities related to obesity, and quality-of-life (QOL) assessment. Definitions of success ...
متن کاملBariatric analysis and reporting outcome
The evaluation of outcome in bariatric surgery is one of the major concerns for surgeons (1). An objective analysis is hindered by the absence of a standard for comparison of data, and by restricted periods of follow-up usually analysed. In fact, different parameters have been proposed in order to assess the outcome after bariatric surgical procedures, as well as the weight loss, the percentage...
متن کاملPreliminary Outcomes 1 Year after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Based on Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS)
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a stand-alone bariatric operation according to the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS). METHODS Out of 112 patients included and operated on initially, 84 patients (F/M, 63:21) were followed up for 14-56 months (mean 22 ± 6.75). Patients lost to follow-up did not attend sche...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery
دوره 28 Suppl 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015